Research Article
Implementation of Spatial and Development Planning in East Kalimantan Province
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.22-10-2019.2291496, author={Wedo Aru Yudhantoro and Arty Dwi Januari and Atiti Setyaning Utami M. and Erline Fitridiah Pitaloka and Kunny Izza Indah A. and Nurul Rusdayanti and Poerborini Damayanti and Sindhung Wardana and Siti Kardian Pramiati and Siti Shara and Hayati Sari Hasibuan and Rudy P. Tambunan}, title={Implementation of Spatial and Development Planning in East Kalimantan Province}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, ICESSD 2019, 22-23 October 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICESSD}, year={2020}, month={3}, keywords={development spatial planning spatial structure urban land use}, doi={10.4108/eai.22-10-2019.2291496} }- Wedo Aru Yudhantoro
Arty Dwi Januari
Atiti Setyaning Utami M.
Erline Fitridiah Pitaloka
Kunny Izza Indah A.
Nurul Rusdayanti
Poerborini Damayanti
Sindhung Wardana
Siti Kardian Pramiati
Siti Shara
Hayati Sari Hasibuan
Rudy P. Tambunan
Year: 2020
Implementation of Spatial and Development Planning in East Kalimantan Province
ICESSD
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.22-10-2019.2291496
Abstract
This study is testing for the truth of development, and correctly implementation from spatial plans document in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. The most significant potential from East Kalimantan is mining products and palm oil products. Qualitative method are used on this research by using analysis process from the real development data from 2016 until 2019 using geospatial analysis process. In mining areal case, the most significant permission already developed in residential areas with number 75,22%, which mean 2.062.075,5 hectare areas. The same problem has happened in palm oil areal that develop in 46,7%, which mean 543.021,92 hectare areas. Another result was showed that in mining and oil palm areas already has overlapping areas in 3,53% or 449.753,53 hectare areas. There is a problem in the development process in the past three years. It needs to evaluate in real to make sure the urban land-use plan from 2016 until 2036 still in the right way.
