Proceedings of the 1st Hasanuddin International Conference on Social and Political Sciences, HICOSPOS 2019, 21-22 October 2019, Makassar, Indonesia

Research Article

Determinants of Innovation Sustainability on Communication Forum of Land Dispute Resolution: A Case Study of Enrekang Regency

Download92 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.21-10-2019.2291522,
        author={Juanda  Nawawi and Asriani  Amir and Andi Muhammad Rusli},
        title={Determinants of Innovation Sustainability on Communication Forum of Land Dispute Resolution: A Case Study of Enrekang Regency},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st Hasanuddin International Conference on Social and Political Sciences, HICOSPOS 2019, 21-22 October 2019, Makassar, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={HICOSPOS},
        year={2020},
        month={2},
        keywords={land dispute local governance communication forum indonesia},
        doi={10.4108/eai.21-10-2019.2291522}
    }
    
  • Juanda Nawawi
    Asriani Amir
    Andi Muhammad Rusli
    Year: 2020
    Determinants of Innovation Sustainability on Communication Forum of Land Dispute Resolution: A Case Study of Enrekang Regency
    HICOSPOS
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.21-10-2019.2291522
Juanda Nawawi1,*, Asriani Amir1, Andi Muhammad Rusli1
  • 1: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar
*Contact email: juandanawawi1808@gmail.com

Abstract

The land dispute resolution communication forum is a form of government innovation in the Anggeraja sub-district in accelerating the dispute resolution land. This research aims to examine and analyze the determining factors of sustainability innovation through the implementation of this forum. The study used qualitative descriptive method with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The results showed that several advantages of innovation did not necessarily become a guarantee for an innovation capable of well-adopted. Several factors are considered representative to support and impede the sustainability of innovation. The changes in the typology of disputes and the social characteristics of the community dominated The decisive resistance of innovation in the implementation of the forum. However, the condition is assessed as temporary, considering the dynamic community mobilization and the potential for unpredictable conflicts