Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of Engineering and Implementation on Vocational Education, ACEIVE 2022, 20 October 2022, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia

Research Article

Analytical Rubric Development Design for Objective Test Assessment

Download462 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.20-10-2022.2328882,
        author={Tuti  Iriani and Anisah  Anisah and Yusrina  Luthfiana and Johar  Maknun and Nitih Indra Komala Dewi},
        title={Analytical Rubric Development Design for Objective Test Assessment},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of Engineering and Implementation on Vocational Education, ACEIVE 2022, 20 October 2022, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ACEIVE},
        year={2023},
        month={5},
        keywords={analytical rubric plomp model objective test assessments},
        doi={10.4108/eai.20-10-2022.2328882}
    }
    
  • Tuti Iriani
    Anisah Anisah
    Yusrina Luthfiana
    Johar Maknun
    Nitih Indra Komala Dewi
    Year: 2023
    Analytical Rubric Development Design for Objective Test Assessment
    ACEIVE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.20-10-2022.2328882
Tuti Iriani1,*, Anisah Anisah1, Yusrina Luthfiana1, Johar Maknun2, Nitih Indra Komala Dewi2
  • 1: Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia
  • 2: Faculty of Technology and Vocational Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
*Contact email: tutiiriani@unj.ac.id

Abstract

The goal of this study was to create an analytic rubric to evaluate students' abilities in compiling objective test assessments. This development research employs the Plomp development model, which is divided into five phases: (1) initial investigation, (2) design, (3) realization, (4) evaluation and revision, and (5) development. Instrumental trials were included in the Learning Evaluation course. This study's sample size is 115 students. The validity results show a measured value greater than 0.3, indicating that the instrument is valid. The correlation value between the criteria measured is greater than 0.5, indicating that all of the criteria measured can be factored by including all items, according to Kaiser Meyer Olkin's (KMO) 0.834 and Bartlett's anti-image correlation with a significance of 0.000. The seven criteria measured yielded two factors, according to exploratory factor analysis. Each criterion has a loading factor value greater than 0.3. The Alpha-Cronbach reliability test yielded a value of 0.800, and the instrument was declared reliable. The conclusion demonstrates that the analytic rubric for assessing performance ability in compiling objective questions is valid, reliable, and practical.