Proceedings of the 2nd Universitas Kuningan International Conference on System, Engineering, and Technology, UNISET 2021, 2 December 2021, Kuningan, West Java, Indonesia

Research Article

Pinpointing Interpersonal Stances in Threatening Discourse on Indonesian Muslim Clerics: An Appraisal Analysis

Download182 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.2-12-2021.2320355,
        author={Marwito  Wihadi and Endang  Darsih and Dadang  Solihat},
        title={Pinpointing Interpersonal Stances in Threatening Discourse on Indonesian Muslim Clerics: An Appraisal Analysis},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd Universitas Kuningan International Conference on System, Engineering, and Technology, UNISET 2021, 2 December 2021, Kuningan, West Java, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={UNISET},
        year={2022},
        month={8},
        keywords={systemic functional linguistics; appraisal analysis; stance; language ideologies; threatening discourse},
        doi={10.4108/eai.2-12-2021.2320355}
    }
    
  • Marwito Wihadi
    Endang Darsih
    Dadang Solihat
    Year: 2022
    Pinpointing Interpersonal Stances in Threatening Discourse on Indonesian Muslim Clerics: An Appraisal Analysis
    UNISET
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.2-12-2021.2320355
Marwito Wihadi1,*, Endang Darsih1, Dadang Solihat1
  • 1: Universitas Kuningan, Kuningan, Indonesia
*Contact email: marwito.wihadi@uniku.ac.id

Abstract

Threatening discourse as a genre is fraught with stances of violence and threatener control in which authorial intent-attributive threats possess particular characteristics strengthening both a threatener’s role in and commitment to act shown, among other things, in the deployment of diverse commitment modals and certainty adverbs. This paper purposes, employing resources of Appraisal analysis, aims to figure out the snapshots deriving from texts in which either writers’ commitment to or attitudes about a person or proposition, interpersonal stances, are construed and function in precipitated threats of violence. Threateners are disclosed to avail themselves of manifold strategies of rhetoric to deliver interpersonal meaning and take stances, not only strengthening but also weakening of their discernible commitment level, which is not in congruence with the partiality of threatening language ideologies. It is imperative that further research on stancetaking in threatening discourse be in depth explored.