Research Article
Politeness Performance Communications National Political Figures Prabowo
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289529, author={Siswanto Siswanto and Ermanto Ermanto and Juita N}, title={Politeness Performance Communications National Political Figures Prabowo}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Education, ICLLE 2019, 22-23 August, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICLLE}, year={2019}, month={11}, keywords={politeness principle communication and national political figures}, doi={10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289529} }
- Siswanto Siswanto
Ermanto Ermanto
Juita N
Year: 2019
Politeness Performance Communications National Political Figures Prabowo
ICLLE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289529
Abstract
Political figures is a public figure who must pay attention to the use of good language, with regard to principles of politeness and other elements. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of the principle of linguistic politeness national political figure Prabowo. The data in this study a speech utterances of six national political figure Prabowo. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. Technical analysis of these data is the identification of data, data classification, inteprestasi data and drawing conclusions.The results of the analysis of utterances national political figures contained Prabowo keep and violates the maxim and the two maxims of politeness principle. Utterances that violate the two maxims of politeness principle, namely: the maxim of wisdom with sympathy as much as 1.03%, the praise with humility as much as 2.06% and kesepakatang with sympathy as much as 3.09%. That is, the speech of national political figures more dominant Prabowo adhere to the principle of politeness, of 97 data adhere to as much as 57 utterances (58.72%) and in violation of 40 utterances (41.28%). These results indicate the use of communication politeness principle national political figure Prabowo included in the language of assessment criteria of "good enough".