
Research Article
From Corrector to Guide: The Evolution of Teacher Feedback Practices in AI-Enhanced EFL Writing Classrooms
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.18-12-2025.2365262, author={Zheng ZENG and Rui DANG}, title={From Corrector to Guide: The Evolution of Teacher Feedback Practices in AI-Enhanced EFL Writing Classrooms}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things, IIKI 2025, 18-21 December 2025, Chengdu, China}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={IIKI}, year={2026}, month={6}, keywords={AI-enhanced EFL writing classroom teacher feedback practices Guide Personalized guidance}, doi={10.4108/eai.18-12-2025.2365262} }- Zheng ZENG
Rui DANG
Year: 2026
From Corrector to Guide: The Evolution of Teacher Feedback Practices in AI-Enhanced EFL Writing Classrooms
IIKI
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.18-12-2025.2365262
Abstract
English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing instruction is pivotal in cultivating students’ comprehensive English competence. Traditionally, teacher feedback has predominantly functioned within a "corrector" paradigm, concentrating on rectifying surface-level linguistic errors. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) is instigating profound transformations in EFL writing pedagogy, catalyzing a pivotal evolution in teacher feedback practices from "corrector" to "guide." By delivering foundational, efficient, and personalized feedback, AI emancipates teachers from the labor-intensive burden of mechanical grading, thereby reorienting their focus towards guiding students in content deepening, logical structuring, and critical thinking enhancement. This article delineates this evolutionary trajectory, examining how AI empowers teachers through personalized guidance, interactive scaffolding, and diversified feedback modalities. It further investigates the essential capacity building and strategic recalibrations required for teachers to thrive in the "guide" role, with the ultimate aim of fostering the holistic development of students’ writing capabilities.


