Research Article
The Fundamental Rights to Freedom of Expression and Its Limits in the Indonesian Constitution
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311669, author={Muhammad Ikram Nur Fuady and Tri Suhendra Arbani and Nurfaika Ishak and Muhammad Yaasiin Raya and Ade Darmawan Basri}, title={The Fundamental Rights to Freedom of Expression and Its Limits in the Indonesian Constitution}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={BIS-HSS}, year={2021}, month={9}, keywords={fundamental rights limits freedom of expression}, doi={10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311669} }
- Muhammad Ikram Nur Fuady
Tri Suhendra Arbani
Nurfaika Ishak
Muhammad Yaasiin Raya
Ade Darmawan Basri
Year: 2021
The Fundamental Rights to Freedom of Expression and Its Limits in the Indonesian Constitution
BIS-HSS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311669
Abstract
This study aims to elaborate the views of the right to freedom of expression in Indonesia with various other countries and create universal concepts and values for the limits of freedom of expression that can be accepted by the general public. The research method used is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a comparative approach. As for the results of the research, freedom of expression both in Indonesia and in various other countries provides open space for action, but there are fundamental things behind it that need to be adhered to collectively and universally, the fundamental thing is the limitations and accountability of the impacts arising from freedom of expression. In this case, the restrictions on expression include an appropriate respect for others' rights and freedoms, racism, and the general welfare of a democratic society. Respect the rights and reputations of others, Does not contain an element of hatred Does not contain fabricated information or hoaxes To adhere to reasonable standards of decency; Acts that violate the sacredness of specific religious values; Protect national security or public order or public health or morals in the interest of national security, territorial integrity, or public safety, to avert chaos or crime, to safeguard one's health or morals, to safeguard one's reputation or rights, to prevent the disclosure of information obtained in secret, and to preserve the judiciary's authority and impartiality.