Research Article
The Applying of the VAK Method in Improving Learning Outcomes in Basketball Dribbling on Physical Education, Health and Recreation Students Faculty of Sport Science, State University of Medan
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287442, author={Muhammad Chairad and Saipul Ambri Damanik and Bangun Setia Hasibuan}, title={The Applying of the VAK Method in Improving Learning Outcomes in Basketball Dribbling on Physical Education, Health and Recreation Students Faculty of Sport Science, State University of Medan}, proceedings={Proceedings of The 5th Annual International Seminar on Trends in Science and Science Education, AISTSSE 2018, 18-19 October 2018, Medan, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={AISTSSE}, year={2019}, month={10}, keywords={visual auditory kinesthetic method (vak) dribbling basketball classroom action research (car)}, doi={10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287442} }
- Muhammad Chairad
Saipul Ambri Damanik
Bangun Setia Hasibuan
Year: 2019
The Applying of the VAK Method in Improving Learning Outcomes in Basketball Dribbling on Physical Education, Health and Recreation Students Faculty of Sport Science, State University of Medan
AISTSSE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287442
Abstract
This study was aims to know increasing the results of learning basketball dribbling through the application of the V.A.K (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) method. It was conducted by using Classroom Action Research (CAR). It was conducted in two cycles. Subject of the study were the students of III semester B Class, it were 30 students of Physical Health and Recreation Education, Faculty Of Sport Science, State University Of Medan. The study was conducted on the basketball court of Faculty Of Sport Science, State University Of Medan in the 2018/2019. Techniques of collecting the data were by using observation sheets and test assessment portfolios. Based on the first test results of 30 students there were 12 students (40%) who have reached the level of learning completeness with an average score of 74.07 student learning outcomes while there were 18 students who had not finished yet (60%). The results of the first cycle have 21 students (70%) who have reached the level of mastery learning with an average value of student learning outcomes 83.47 while there were 9 students (30%) who did not complete it. In cycle II there were 27 students from 30 students (90%) who have reached the level of learning completeness with an average score of 85.60 while there were 3 students (10%) who did not complete it.