Research Article
Feasibility of Electroplating Learning Module Based on Case Method and Stakeholder Needs Oriented
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.17-9-2024.2353104, author={Erma Yulia and Irwan Irwan and Riski Elpari Siregar and Binsar M Pakpahan}, title={Feasibility of Electroplating Learning Module Based on Case Method and Stakeholder Needs Oriented}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Innovation in Education, Science, and Culture, ICIESC 2024, 17 September 2024, Medan, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICIESC}, year={2025}, month={1}, keywords={feasibility module electroplating case method stakeholders}, doi={10.4108/eai.17-9-2024.2353104} }
- Erma Yulia
Irwan Irwan
Riski Elpari Siregar
Binsar M Pakpahan
Year: 2025
Feasibility of Electroplating Learning Module Based on Case Method and Stakeholder Needs Oriented
ICIESC
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.17-9-2024.2353104
Abstract
This study aims to obtain the feasibility of electroplating learning module based on case method and stakeholder needs oriented. As a guide while creating modules using the ADD (analysis, design and development) development model, namely (1) needs analysis stage, namely conducting FGD with stakeholders and graduate users, (2) design stage, which includes creating learning goals, (3) development stage, specifically the creation of modules and the preparation of materials (4) evaluation stage, namely feasibility assessment by experting in learning materials, learning design, and learning media. The research subjects were 30 students majoring in Mechanical Engineering Education, Unimed who took part in the electroplating learning process. Data collection techniques in analyzing the needs and feasibility of are conducted through the distribution of surveys. The experts employed a Likert scale in their feasibility assessment criteria, which included category values of 5 (very good), 4 (good), 3 (fairly good), 2 (poor) and 1 (very poor), which were analyzed descriptively. The research results showed that the suitability of material experts was 84.8%,learning design experts 90.6%,and learning media experts 82.2%.