Research Article
Evaluation of the Implementation of the OBE Curriculum with the CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, and Product) at the Faculty of Economics State University of Medan
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.17-9-2024.2352989, author={Choms Gary Ganda Tua Sibarani and Jabal Ahsan and Andi Taufiq Umar}, title={Evaluation of the Implementation of the OBE Curriculum with the CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, and Product) at the Faculty of Economics State University of Medan}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Innovation in Education, Science, and Culture, ICIESC 2024, 17 September 2024, Medan, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICIESC}, year={2025}, month={1}, keywords={program evaluation cipp model obe}, doi={10.4108/eai.17-9-2024.2352989} }- Choms Gary Ganda Tua Sibarani
Jabal Ahsan
Andi Taufiq Umar
Year: 2025
Evaluation of the Implementation of the OBE Curriculum with the CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, and Product) at the Faculty of Economics State University of Medan
ICIESC
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.17-9-2024.2352989
Abstract
Since the curriculum is the primary factor influencing learning performance, an assessment must be carried out in order to enhance and examine how the curriculum is being implemented. Using the CIPP (context, input, process, product) assessment approach, the researcher investigates the implementation of the OBE (Outcome Base Education) Curriculum at the State University of Medan's Faculty of Economics. This study employs a mixed method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative techniques. Students in the second semester of three majors at FE Universitas Negeri Medan—accounting, economics, and management—as well as a number of faculty members served as participants in this study. The primary tool used in the data collection method is a questionnaire, and the percentage of respondents' achievement rate (TCR Test) is used to assess quantitative data. The data reduction, data display, and conclusion/verification methodologies developed by Miles and Huberman were used to examine the interview data gathering as a supporting tool. The following are the results: 1) The context dimension's average score of 64.21 indicates "enough" outcomes. 2) With an average score of 63.99, the input dimension demonstrated "enough" outcomes. 3) With an average score of 64.47, the process dimension demonstrated "enough" outcomes. 4) With an average score of 63.25, the product dimension demonstrated "enough" outcomes.
