Research Article
Famous Brand Criteria and Protection of the Law Based on the Decision of the Court of RI Number 32 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.17-7-2019.2303353, author={Alya Nuzulul Qurniasari and Budi Santoso and Sartika Nanda Lestari}, title={Famous Brand Criteria and Protection of the Law Based on the Decision of the Court of RI Number 32 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Science and Technology in Administration and Management Information, ICSTIAMI 2019, 17-18 July 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICSTIAMI}, year={2021}, month={1}, keywords={legal protection right to trademark famous trademark}, doi={10.4108/eai.17-7-2019.2303353} }
- Alya Nuzulul Qurniasari
Budi Santoso
Sartika Nanda Lestari
Year: 2021
Famous Brand Criteria and Protection of the Law Based on the Decision of the Court of RI Number 32 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018
ICSTIAMI
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.17-7-2019.2303353
Abstract
The brand does not only function as a differentiator, but also functions as a company asset, especially a well-known brand. The problem of this research is determining the criteria for famous brands according to the Trademark Law and international regulations. Legal protection given to Skyworth brand owners and how the Judges consider the basis in deciding this case. Skyworth Company registered for class 16 in 2004. However, in 2016, Skyworth registered for goods/services class 7, 9 and 11 rejected by the Directorate General of IPR because Linawaty Hardjono had registered the mark goods/services of the same class without Skyworth Company's permission in 2006. The method used is a normative juridical method with qualitative analysis methods. From the results of the Skyworth Trademark research, it is included in the criteria of famous brands according to the Trademark Law and international regulations (Paris Convention, TRIPs, WIPO). Legal protection used is preventive and repressive legal protection. Basic Judges' consideration is the existence of a judge's mistake when deciding a case and when the judge rejects the Plaintiff's claim. The suggestion given is immediately made a register of famous brands according to the criteria in the law and Permenkumham, The Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights must be more assertive in acting against the perpetrators of brand violations and the criminal sanctions imposed must be in accordance with the law.