About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Science and Technology in Administration and Management Information, ICSTIAMI 2019, 17-18 July 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia

Research Article

United States Policy on China Steel Products Viewed From GATT/WTO

Download660 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.17-7-2019.2303009,
        author={Hilmi  Prabowo and Nanik  Trihastuti and Darminto  Hartono},
        title={United States Policy on China Steel Products Viewed From GATT/WTO},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Science and Technology in Administration and Management Information, ICSTIAMI 2019, 17-18 July 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICSTIAMI},
        year={2021},
        month={1},
        keywords={united states china wto/gatt dispute rates},
        doi={10.4108/eai.17-7-2019.2303009}
    }
    
  • Hilmi Prabowo
    Nanik Trihastuti
    Darminto Hartono
    Year: 2021
    United States Policy on China Steel Products Viewed From GATT/WTO
    ICSTIAMI
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.17-7-2019.2303009
Hilmi Prabowo1,*, Nanik Trihastuti1, Darminto Hartono1
  • 1: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, S.H., Semarang, Indonesia 50275
*Contact email: hlmprbw@gmail.com

Abstract

International trade should be conducted without discrimination. The study discusses the adoption of China's steel tariffs by the United States, as well as the efforts to be made by the United States and China to settle steel tariff disputes. This method of research is normative juridical. The results of U.S. studies violated the Most-favoured-nation (MFN) found in article 1.1 GATT 1947. The settlement of the tariff disputes is conducted through consultation only if it fails to be submitted to DSB. DSB forms a panel to make decisions. Parties who are dissatisfied with the Panel's decisions may forward the matter to Apellatebody, and if this entity fails as well, the dispute resolution then is conducted through the arbitral institutions they choose.

Keywords
united states china wto/gatt dispute rates
Published
2021-01-27
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-7-2019.2303009
Copyright © 2019–2025 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL