About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovation in Education, Science, and Culture, ICIESC 2025, 16 September 2025, Medan, Indonesia

Research Article

Enhancing Strength Assessment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Velocity-Based and Isometric Methods for 1RM Estimation

Download2 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.16-9-2025.2361061,
        author={Asep  Prima and Putra  Arima and Melly  Br Bangun},
        title={ Enhancing Strength Assessment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Velocity-Based and Isometric Methods for 1RM Estimation},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovation in Education, Science, and Culture, ICIESC 2025, 16 September 2025, Medan, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICIESC},
        year={2026},
        month={3},
        keywords={one-repetition maximum (1rm) load-velocity relationship (l-v) isometric midthigh pull (imtp) strength estimation methods bibliometric analysis},
        doi={10.4108/eai.16-9-2025.2361061}
    }
    
  • Asep Prima
    Putra Arima
    Melly Br Bangun
    Year: 2026
    Enhancing Strength Assessment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Velocity-Based and Isometric Methods for 1RM Estimation
    ICIESC
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.16-9-2025.2361061
Asep Prima1,*, Putra Arima1, Melly Br Bangun2
  • 1: Faculty of Sports Science, Universitas Negeri Medan, Jl. William Iskandar Ps. V, Deli Serdang 20221, Indonesia
  • 2: Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Medan, Jl. William Iskandar Ps. V, Deli Serdang 20221, Indonesia
*Contact email: asepprima@unimed.ac.id

Abstract

This study explores safer and more efficient alternatives to traditional one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing, particularly for the elderly or individuals with medical conditions. It focuses on velocity-based methods, specifically the load-velocity (L-V) relationship, and isometric approaches, like the isometric midthigh pull (IMTP), which correlate strongly with maximal strength while reducing fatigue and injury risk. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software was conducted on articles from 2015 to 2025 to map trends, identify key researchers, and highlight gaps. The results show a growing interest in 1RM estimation since 2017. L-V methods relate lifting velocity to maximal strength, while isometric tests offer fatigue-free alternatives. However, variability in technique and individual response remains a challenge. The study underscores the need to standardize these methods for broader applicability. Future research should enhance accuracy, especially for untrained and clinical populations. Overall, alternative 1RM estimation methods show promise but require refinement and validation.

Keywords
one-repetition maximum (1rm), load-velocity relationship (l-v), isometric midthigh pull (imtp), strength estimation methods, bibliometric analysis
Published
2026-03-18
Publisher
EAI
http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-9-2025.2361061
Copyright © 2025–2026 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL