Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia

Research Article

Due To the Law of The Court's Establishment Regarding the Status of Not Attendance with The Instruction

Download162 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320096,
        author={Muhammad Ali Fitran and Riswadi  Riswadi},
        title={Due To the Law of The Court's Establishment Regarding the Status of Not Attendance with The Instruction},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICLSSEE},
        year={2022},
        month={8},
        keywords={not attendance; nstruction; regarding},
        doi={10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320096}
    }
    
  • Muhammad Ali Fitran
    Riswadi Riswadi
    Year: 2022
    Due To the Law of The Court's Establishment Regarding the Status of Not Attendance with The Instruction
    ICLSSEE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320096
Muhammad Ali Fitran1,*, Riswadi Riswadi1
  • 1: Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
*Contact email: alifitran@gmail.com

Abstract

The state of absence does not eliminate a person's status as a legal subject, but someone who is not present continuously will have legal consequences. This is because it cannot be ascertained whether he has died or is still alive. A person who is not present cannot perform his obligations as a legal subject until the time he returns. This research was conducted using a qualitative method, collecting all information related to the process/procedure and the legal consequences of court decisions regarding the absence of inheritance for inheritance. The researcher will present the results of this research in an analytical descriptive manner by comparing the determination of the absence of attendance at the Tegal District Court with the relevant laws and regulations. The results showed that the process/procedure for determining the status of absenteeism at the Tegal District Court in practice was under the provisions of the existing laws and regulations. The difference lies only in the payment of witnesses. Supposedly, the cost of witnesses by the District Court, but in practice, the costs of witnesses are borne by the Petitioner.