Research Article
The Implementation of The Judge in The Penal Era of The Pandemic Covid - 19 in The United States
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320086, author={Liza Persimmon and Faisal Santiago}, title={The Implementation of The Judge in The Penal Era of The Pandemic Covid - 19 in The United States}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICLSSEE}, year={2022}, month={8}, keywords={trial implementation; criminal; covid-19 pandemic}, doi={10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320086} }- Liza Persimmon
Faisal Santiago
Year: 2022
The Implementation of The Judge in The Penal Era of The Pandemic Covid - 19 in The United States
ICLSSEE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320086
Abstract
In Indonesia, the procedure for the trial is guided by the rule of the Republic of Indonesia No. 8 of 1981 based on the Penal Code. The problem is held directly and orally; the defendant is required to attend and so on, but in the outbreak period covid-19, the implementation of the direct siding may not be possible because it can be one of the causes of the covid-19 outbreak disease's growth. The inductive norms case study approach was applied in this work, the normative legal research method, which is then supported by the addition of data or empirical elements. The trial may continue to be conducted with a fixed provision guided by the health protocol, and the criminal trial may be postponed if the panel of judges grants the request. The Judge implementation can be carried out online to prevent not contracting the corona outbreak.
