Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia

Research Article

Carding Crime Analysis as A Form of Cyber Crime in Indonesia's Criminal Law

Download333 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320085,
        author={Novi Asih Muharam and Azis  Budianto},
        title={Carding Crime Analysis as A Form of Cyber Crime in Indonesia's Criminal Law},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICLSSEE},
        year={2022},
        month={8},
        keywords={carding crime; cybercrime; criminal law},
        doi={10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320085}
    }
    
  • Novi Asih Muharam
    Azis Budianto
    Year: 2022
    Carding Crime Analysis as A Form of Cyber Crime in Indonesia's Criminal Law
    ICLSSEE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320085
Novi Asih Muharam1,*, Azis Budianto1
  • 1: Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
*Contact email: novighezhaa@gmail.com

Abstract

The objective of this study is to learn much about the regulation. of the crime of carding in Indonesian criminal law and to find out more about efforts to overcome the crime of carding. The findings of this study show that the murder of frisking is controlled in Law No. 19 of 2016 amending Act No. 11 of 2008 concerning Digital Transactions, and that 've got for the violence of scoring besides the Rules on Digital Activities and Data can be devised in the Revised Penal code to use a vast depending upon the context of the publications stored in the Crpc. The control of frisking crimes in Indonesia is governed according to the modus operandi in the legislation, which is included in the Criminal Code, specifically Articles 362, 363, and 378 of the Criminal Code relating theft and fraud. Special rules well outside Sedition Act, namely Law No. 19 of 2016 amending Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Relevant data and Digital Payments as lex experts, even those governed in Article 30 in relation to Article 46 as the robbery editorial, Press release 34 section (1) in relation to Article 50 as a story regarding thievery brought out in partnership by three or more individuals, and in Article 35 in tandem with Article 51 sentence (1) as an article theft carried out in collaboration by two or more people.