Research Article
Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators on The Corruption Delik Based on Legal and Ham Satisfaction
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082, author={Joko Cahyono}, title={Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators on The Corruption Delik Based on Legal and Ham Satisfaction}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICLSSEE}, year={2022}, month={8}, keywords={justice collaborator; uud ri 1945; human rights (ham)}, doi={10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082} }- Joko Cahyono
Year: 2022
Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators on The Corruption Delik Based on Legal and Ham Satisfaction
ICLSSEE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2320082
Abstract
This scientific journal discusses the arrangements for implementing and granting witness status in cooperation or known as the Justice Collaborator, which invites pro and cons issues about their usefulness and consequently can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in providing their determination. To answer the question that became public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the Law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically so that an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law governing Justice Collaborator is in accordance with the objectives in terms of revealing the main actors and recovering losses countries related to the economy and development. Furthermore, t1 investigate why the status Acts of corruption were established by the Justice Collaborator in criminal proceedings does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principle of expediency and justice while maintaining a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.