Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia

Research Article

Legal Strength of Evidence Photocopy of Letter or Written Evidence in Civil Matter

Download254 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2319836,
        author={Santi  Wijaya and Suparno  Suparno},
        title={Legal Strength of Evidence Photocopy of Letter or Written Evidence in Civil Matter},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICLSSEE},
        year={2022},
        month={8},
        keywords={power of law; written evidence; civil},
        doi={10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2319836}
    }
    
  • Santi Wijaya
    Suparno Suparno
    Year: 2022
    Legal Strength of Evidence Photocopy of Letter or Written Evidence in Civil Matter
    ICLSSEE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2319836
Santi Wijaya1,*, Suparno Suparno1
  • 1: Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
*Contact email: shantywta06@gmail.com

Abstract

Evidence in the civil court process is the truth that the judge seeks and realizes. There are in the common court process is reality that the appointed authority looks for and understands. There are times when the gatherings submit evidence of a letter as a copy yet never again have the first letter, so it can't be coordinated with the first letter at the preliminary times when the parties submit proof of a letter in the form of a photocopy but no longer have the original letter, so it cannot be matched with the original letter at the trial. The sort of exploration is library research with a regularizing lawful examination approach. The information examination technique was done logically and investigated by subjective standardizing strategies. The consequences of the review presumed that a copy of a letter or composed proof in a common case could be acknowledged whether the copy of the letter has been coordinated with the first or by an authority proclaimed to be under the original and has perfect and binding evidentiary power, and the legal basis for the judge's thought in inspecting proof. Copy of the letter on Decision Number 23/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bbs, to be specific the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in Supreme Court Decision No. 3609 K/Pdt/1985 that a copy of a letter/report which can never be demonstrated to be unique can't be considered as proof of a letter as indicated by the Civil Procedure Code.