Research Article
Causation Analysis and Resilience Governance of Production Safety Accidents:A Case Study of 83 Gas Production Explosion Accidents
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.15-3-2024.2346551, author={Shuaile Li}, title={Causation Analysis and Resilience Governance of Production Safety Accidents:A Case Study of 83 Gas Production Explosion Accidents}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Public Management and Intelligent Society, PMIS 2024, 15--17 March 2024, Changsha, China}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={PMIS}, year={2024}, month={6}, keywords={safety production; accident causation; resilience governance}, doi={10.4108/eai.15-3-2024.2346551} }
- Shuaile Li
Year: 2024
Causation Analysis and Resilience Governance of Production Safety Accidents:A Case Study of 83 Gas Production Explosion Accidents
PMIS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.15-3-2024.2346551
Abstract
Safety production is related to the well-being of people, social prosperity and stability. It is a comprehensive reflection of the government's supervision capacity. This paper summarises the causal factors of gas explosion safety production accidents based on 83 reports. The causal factors are categorised into five levels: personnel, equipment, environment, business management, and government supervision. Through data statistics, the key and important causal factors of gas safety production accidents are identified and analysed. The paper also examines the differences between the key causal factors of three types of gas safety production accidents. The SPSS software was used to analyze the strength of association between the factors at each level. The results revealed the risk transmission path of safety production between the government's ineffective supervision, the enterprise's insufficient safety awareness, and the employee's improper operation. The research findings propose a new approach to enhance the comprehensive management capacity of the safety production system from the perspective of resilience governance. This promotes the development of the traditional risk governance model from passive and negative to multi-angle virtuous development, such as sustained adaptation, proactive error correction, systematic learning and multi-dimensional cooperation.