Research Article
Authority Of Public Notary as Dispute Councils in Procurement of Government Goods/Services
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.14-12-2021.2318375, author={Endra Mayendra}, title={Authority Of Public Notary as Dispute Councils in Procurement of Government Goods/Services}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economic and Education, ICON 2021, 14 - 15 December 2021, Padang-West Sumatra, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICON}, year={2022}, month={7}, keywords={dispute; dispute council; notary}, doi={10.4108/eai.14-12-2021.2318375} }
- Endra Mayendra
Year: 2022
Authority Of Public Notary as Dispute Councils in Procurement of Government Goods/Services
ICON
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.14-12-2021.2318375
Abstract
Regulations on the procurement of government goods and services to accommodate dispute resolution are regulated through deliberation and consensus. When this is not achieved, the regulation is carried out through arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, or courts. In practice, in resolving disputes over government goods/services procurement, a Notary can act as a party preventing disputes between the parties in a government goods/services procurement agreement by being involved as a member of the dispute council. Problems are the notary's authority as the Dispute Council in the Disputes Resolution on the Procurement of Government Goods/Services. This research is normative legal research: library research, i.e., research on secondary legal sources. When carrying out the function as a Notary, the fully attached authority is the authority of a Notary and remains subject to the UUJN and the Notary Code of Ethics. Meanwhile, as a member of the dispute council, the inherent authority is the authority as a dispute council. Notaries who act as dispute councils can play an active role in preventing disputes in implementing contracts. If disputes still arise, the notary plays a role in resolving disputes.