Research Article
Development and Validity of An Ecological Wisdom-Themed Reading Literacy Instrument
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.11-12-2024.2360415, author={Akhmad Mukhibun and Andayani Andayani and Sumarwati Sumarwati}, title={Development and Validity of An Ecological Wisdom-Themed Reading Literacy Instrument}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Humanities and Social Science, ICHSS 2024, 11 December 2024, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICHSS}, year={2025}, month={12}, keywords={development of reading literacy instruments validity of reading literacy instruments ecological wisdom reading comprehension junior high school students rural areas}, doi={10.4108/eai.11-12-2024.2360415} }- Akhmad Mukhibun
Andayani Andayani
Sumarwati Sumarwati
Year: 2025
Development and Validity of An Ecological Wisdom-Themed Reading Literacy Instrument
ICHSS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.11-12-2024.2360415
Abstract
Reading literacy is an important competency for Indonesian students. This is because good reading literacy competencies will form literate Indonesian students. Literate students will be able to capture information, understand the context of the message, and be able to think critically. This study aims to develop and validate a reading literacy measurement instrument with the theme of ecological wisdom for junior high school students in the Karanganyar Regency Rural Area. This research is an exploratory mixed method research, namely mixed research with qualitative-quantitative stages. The data in this study are in the form of lingual units and numbers. Data sources were obtained through scientific documents on reading literacy, ecological wisdom, Indonesian language experts, students of SMPN 1 Karangpandan, and SMPN 2 Karangpandan. The data collection technique was done by literature study, expert validation questionnaire, and ecological wisdom-themed reading literacy instrument. The analysis technique was carried out qualitatively and quantitatively, namely through thematic analysis, content and empirical validity testing, and reliability testing. The results showed that the content validity with Aiken's V formula was 0.828 so that the instrument was declared to have high validity. Empirical validity testing shows the value of pearson corellation r count> r table on 29 items and r count < r table on 1 item so that 29 items are valid and 1 item is invalid.
