Research Article
Banking Performance iIndonesia Pandemic Times: Comparison Between Conventional Commercial Banks And Sharia Commercial Banks
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.11-10-2021.2319496, author={Syukri Iska and Ifelda Nengsih}, title={Banking Performance iIndonesia Pandemic Times: Comparison Between Conventional Commercial Banks And Sharia Commercial Banks}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 6th Batusangkar International Conference, BIC 2021, 11 - 12 October, 2021, Batusangkar-West Sumatra, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={BIC}, year={2022}, month={8}, keywords={banking performance; pandemic; conventional commercial bank; sharia commercial bank}, doi={10.4108/eai.11-10-2021.2319496} }- Syukri Iska
Ifelda Nengsih
Year: 2022
Banking Performance iIndonesia Pandemic Times: Comparison Between Conventional Commercial Banks And Sharia Commercial Banks
BIC
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.11-10-2021.2319496
Abstract
When Islamic banks were able to survive the economic crisis in Indonesia in 1997/1998 and 2018, compared to conventional banks, it has also prompted them to explore the existence of the two banking institutions in the face of the Covid 19 Pandemic which has had a negative impact on economic growth in Indonesia. Therefore, this study aims to see how the performance of conventional banking is compared to Islamic banking during the pandemic by focusing on commercial banks only. The research method uses a documentation study of banking data presented from various relevant sources, such as the OJK. The data are grouped according to the aspects being compared for further analysis. The study found that Islamic Commercial Banks (BUS) had better performance than Conventional Commercial Banks (BUK) in terms of: asset growth, fund distribution, TPF, and ROA. In the NPL/F aspect, BUS are 0,07 points higher than BUK.