Research Article
Systematic review on Artificial Intelligence in the editorial management of scientific journals
@ARTICLE{10.4108/airo.5643, author={Carlos Rafael Araujo Inastrilla and Mayelin Llosa Santana and Dayami Guti\^{e}rrez Vera and Mar\^{\i}a del Carmen Roche Madrigal and Alejandro Rodr\^{\i}guez Urrutia and Alejandro Araujo Inastrilla}, title={Systematic review on Artificial Intelligence in the editorial management of scientific journals}, journal={EAI Endorsed Transactions on AI and Robotics}, volume={3}, number={1}, publisher={EAI}, journal_a={AIRO}, year={2024}, month={12}, keywords={Artificial Intelligence, editorial management, scientific journal, systematic review}, doi={10.4108/airo.5643} }
- Carlos Rafael Araujo Inastrilla
Mayelin Llosa Santana
Dayami Gutiérrez Vera
María del Carmen Roche Madrigal
Alejandro Rodríguez Urrutia
Alejandro Araujo Inastrilla
Year: 2024
Systematic review on Artificial Intelligence in the editorial management of scientific journals
AIRO
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/airo.5643
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: scientific journals play a crucial role in the dissemination and validation of scientific knowledge, and editorial management ranges from conceptualization to post-publication of content. Artificial intelligence (AI) has had a great impact on scientific communication and editorial management of scientific journals. AI can offer solutions and benefits for editorial management, but it also poses technical, economic, social and ethical challenges that should be considered and approached with caution and responsibility. OBJECTIVE: to describe the benefits and limitations of the use of AI in the editorial management of scientific journals through a systematic literature review. METHOD: a systematic literature review was conducted based on the PRISMA methodology. An information search was carried out in different bibliographic database systems, indexing systems and search engines, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the identified studies. RESULTS: the information search allowed retrieving a total of 2750 sources, of which 10 articles that met the stated criteria were included. Benefits such as the facilitation of writing, translation, review and editing tasks were identified, as well as limitations related to ethical issues, bias, errors and plagiarism generated by AI. CONCLUSIONS: While AI can streamline the production and analysis of information distribution, it also poses challenges in terms of reliability, ethics and authenticity of published content. It requires the critical involvement of human intelligence for proper exploitation.
Copyright © 2024 Inastrilla et al., licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.