Research Article
Analysis of Varying Approaches to Topical Web Query Classification
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/ICST.INFOSCALE2008.3487, author={Steven M. Beitzel and Eric C. Jensen and Abdur Chowdhury and Ophir Frieder}, title={Analysis of Varying Approaches to Topical Web Query Classification}, proceedings={3rd International ICST Conference on Scalable Information Systems}, publisher={ICST}, proceedings_a={INFOSCALE}, year={2010}, month={5}, keywords={query classification web search}, doi={10.4108/ICST.INFOSCALE2008.3487} }
- Steven M. Beitzel
Eric C. Jensen
Abdur Chowdhury
Ophir Frieder
Year: 2010
Analysis of Varying Approaches to Topical Web Query Classification
INFOSCALE
ICST
DOI: 10.4108/ICST.INFOSCALE2008.3487
Abstract
Topical classification of web queries has drawn recent interest from forums such as the 2005 KDD Cup because of the promise it offers in improving retrieval effectiveness and efficiency. Many proposed techniques make use of documents classified in taxonomies (such as the ODP: Open Directory Project -- http://www.dmoz.org) to inform on the class of a web query. Implicit in these approaches is the assumption that topically classifying queries is equivalent to the general topical text classification task (although with few directly available features from such short queries). We test this assumption by comparing and combining classifiers trained directly from manually classified queries and their retrieved documents, trained from categorized documents in the ODP, and induced from unlabeled query logs for pre-retrieval classification. We find that training classifiers directly from manually classified queries outperforms the best general topical classifier by 48% in relative F1 score. We attribute this to a mismatch in task when applying a general classifier to queries. For example, a typically vague web query classified as "business" is likely to retrieve documents classified as "news" and "organizations" in addition to those labeled "business." Equating a "business" class of queries with a "business" class of documents, then, is not appropriate.