1st International ICST Conference on Ambient Media and Systems

Research Article

Bypass AODV: improving performance of ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol in wireless ad hoc networks

Download555 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/ICST.AMBISYS2008.2895,
        author={Ahed M. Alshanyour and Uthman Baroudi},
        title={Bypass AODV: improving performance of ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol in wireless ad hoc networks},
        proceedings={1st International ICST Conference on Ambient Media and Systems},
        publisher={ICST},
        proceedings_a={AMBI-SYS},
        year={2010},
        month={5},
        keywords={Bypass routing Bypass-AODV Ad hoc networks reliable routing Cross-layer design.},
        doi={10.4108/ICST.AMBISYS2008.2895}
    }
    
  • Ahed M. Alshanyour
    Uthman Baroudi
    Year: 2010
    Bypass AODV: improving performance of ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol in wireless ad hoc networks
    AMBI-SYS
    ICST
    DOI: 10.4108/ICST.AMBISYS2008.2895
Ahed M. Alshanyour1,*, Uthman Baroudi1,*
  • 1: King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Computer Engineering Department, Dhahran-Saudi Arabia
*Contact email: shanyour@kfupm.edu.sa, ubaroudi@kfupm.edu.sa

Abstract

Bypass-AODV, a local recovery protocol, is proposed to enhance the performance of AODV routing protocol by overcoming several inherited problems such as unnecessary error recovery invocations, newly non-optimal reconstructed routes, high packet drop ratios, and high routing overheads. Bypass-AODV uses cross-layer MAC-notification to identify mobility-related link break, and then setup a bypass between the broken-link end nodes via an alternative node while keeps on the rest of the route. Therefore, Bypass-AODV enhances resource utilization by avoiding unnecessary error recovery cycles and consequently increases the network throughput. On the other hand, Bypass- AODV enhances route reliability; it avoids dropping packets by transmitting them over the constructed bypass. The simulation results show that when running 1-TCP connection, Bypass- AODV performs better than AODV. In particular, this behavior is rapidly changed with increasing the physical distance between the TCP connection end nodes beyond 2 hops. For example, when number of hops is equal to 6, goodput is enhanced by more than 100% compared to AODV for a 1-TCP connection and about 24% for multiple TCP connections. Further, the ratio of packet drop is reduced from 16% to 2%. Moreover, considering the hop count, the Bypass-AODV shows less sensitivity to the ongoing number of TCP connections.