1st International ICST Conference on Access Networks

Research Article

A comparison of MANETs and WMNs: commercial feasibility of community wireless networks and MANETs

  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1145/1189355.1189373,
        author={Sahibzada  Ali Mahmud and Shahbaz  Khan and Shoaib  Khan and Hamed Al- Raweshidy},
        title={A comparison of MANETs and WMNs: commercial feasibility of community wireless networks and MANETs},
        proceedings={1st International ICST Conference on Access Networks},
        publisher={ACM},
        proceedings_a={ACCESSNETS},
        year={2006},
        month={9},
        keywords={Wireless Mesh Networks Community Wireless Networks Mobile Ad-hoc Networks.},
        doi={10.1145/1189355.1189373}
    }
    
  • Sahibzada Ali Mahmud
    Shahbaz Khan
    Shoaib Khan
    Hamed Al- Raweshidy
    Year: 2006
    A comparison of MANETs and WMNs: commercial feasibility of community wireless networks and MANETs
    ACCESSNETS
    ACM
    DOI: 10.1145/1189355.1189373
Sahibzada Ali Mahmud1,*, Shahbaz Khan1,*, Shoaib Khan1,*, Hamed Al- Raweshidy2,3,4,*
  • 1: Brunel University, West London, UK
  • 2: Brunel University, West London, UK.
  • 3: Raweshidy@brun
  • 4: el.ac.uk
*Contact email: ali.sahibzada@brunel.ac.uk, Shahbaz.khan@brunel.ac.uk, shoaib.khan@brunel.ac.uk, Hamed.Al-Raweshidy@brunel.ac.uk

Abstract

In the past a lot of effort has been put into resolving some of the major challenges of AdHoc networks especially the added ones brought up by the mobility of nodes and the absence of infrastructure in MANETs. Unlike MANETs, Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) provide flexibility in terms of mobility i.e. Mesh clients can be stationary or mobile and can form a client mesh network among themselves and with mesh routers. WMNs make use of multiple radios and multiple channels per radio for increased capacity, higher throughput and low interference. We gave an overview of the work done on MANETs, experimental Community Wireless Networks (CWNs) and Industrial solutions for mesh networks. We highlighted the differences between WMNS and MANETs and how WMNs can overcome the limitations of MANETs. This paper also compares the feasibility and scope of forecasted applications for MANETs and WMNs. In the end, we gave a conclusion about the commercial viability of MANETs and the growing scope of applications proposed for WMNs.