About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Advances in Computer Science and Information Technology. Computer Science and Engineering. Second International Conference, CCSIT 2012, Bangalore, India, January 2-4, 2012. Proceedings, Part II

Research Article

Comparison between Different Feature Extraction Techniques to Identify the Emotion ‘Anger’ in Speech

Download(Requires a free EAI acccount)
660 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1007/978-3-642-27308-7_67,
        author={Bageshree Pathak and Ashish Panat},
        title={Comparison between Different Feature Extraction Techniques to Identify the Emotion ‘Anger’ in Speech},
        proceedings={Advances in Computer Science and Information Technology. Computer Science and Engineering. Second International Conference, CCSIT 2012, Bangalore, India, January 2-4, 2012. Proceedings, Part II},
        proceedings_a={CCSIT PATR II},
        year={2012},
        month={11},
        keywords={feature vector VQ MFCC cepstrum HMM TEO LPCC LFPC},
        doi={10.1007/978-3-642-27308-7_67}
    }
    
  • Bageshree Pathak
    Ashish Panat
    Year: 2012
    Comparison between Different Feature Extraction Techniques to Identify the Emotion ‘Anger’ in Speech
    CCSIT PATR II
    Springer
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-27308-7_67
Bageshree Pathak1,*, Ashish Panat2,*
  • 1: Cummins College of Engg for Women
  • 2: Priyadarshani Indira College of Engg.
*Contact email: bvpathak100@yahoo.com, ashishpanat@gmail.com

Abstract

In this paper, three different techniques of feature extraction for identification of emotion in speech have been compared. Traditional feature like LPCC (Linear Predictive Cepstral Coefficient) and MFCC (Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient) have been described. Linear features like LFPC which is FFT based have been explained. Finally TEO (Teager Energy Operator) based nonlinear LFPC features in both time and freqnency domain have been proposed and the performance of the proposed system is compared with the traditional features. The comparison of each approach is performed using SUSAS (Speech Under Simulated and Acid Stress) and ESMBS (Emotional Speech of Mandarin and Burmese Speakers) databases. It is observed that proposed system outperforms the traditional systems. Analysis will be carried for identification mainly of the emotion ‘Anger’ in this paper.

Keywords
feature vector VQ MFCC cepstrum HMM TEO LPCC LFPC
Published
2012-11-09
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27308-7_67
Copyright © 2012–2025 ICST
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL