Research Article
Mixed-Initiative Argumentation: Group Decision Support in Medicine
467 downloads
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.1007/978-3-642-11745-9_8, author={Chee Chang and Andrew Miller and Aditya Ghose}, title={Mixed-Initiative Argumentation: Group Decision Support in Medicine}, proceedings={Electronic Healthcare. Second International ICST Conference, eHealth 2009, Istanbul, Turkey, September 23-15, 2009, Revised Selected Papers}, proceedings_a={E-HEALTH}, year={2012}, month={5}, keywords={Abstract Argumentation System Group Decision Support Knowledge Management System}, doi={10.1007/978-3-642-11745-9_8} }
- Chee Chang
Andrew Miller
Aditya Ghose
Year: 2012
Mixed-Initiative Argumentation: Group Decision Support in Medicine
E-HEALTH
Springer
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11745-9_8
Abstract
This paper identifies ways in which traditional approaches to argumentation can be modified to meet the needs of practical group decision support. Three specific modifications are proposed. Firstly, a framework for accrual-based argumentation is presented. Second, a framework for outcome-driven decision rationale management is proposed that permits a novel conception of mixed-initiative argumentation. The framework is evaluated in the context of group decision support in medicine.
Copyright © 2009–2024 ICST