Electronic Healthcare. First International Conference, eHealth 2008, London, UK, September 8-9, 2008. Revised Selected Papers

Research Article

An Evaluation Framework for EU Research and Development e-Health Projects’ Systems

Download
431 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1007/978-3-642-00413-1_2,
        author={Androklis Mavridis and Stamatia-Ann Katriou and Adamantios Koumpis},
        title={An Evaluation Framework for EU Research and Development e-Health Projects’ Systems},
        proceedings={Electronic Healthcare. First International Conference, eHealth 2008, London, UK, September 8-9, 2008. Revised Selected Papers},
        proceedings_a={E-HEALTH},
        year={2012},
        month={5},
        keywords={Evaluation e-Health Research and Development projects Software},
        doi={10.1007/978-3-642-00413-1_2}
    }
    
  • Androklis Mavridis
    Stamatia-Ann Katriou
    Adamantios Koumpis
    Year: 2012
    An Evaluation Framework for EU Research and Development e-Health Projects’ Systems
    E-HEALTH
    Springer
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00413-1_2
Androklis Mavridis1,*, Stamatia-Ann Katriou1, Adamantios Koumpis1,*
  • 1: ALTEC S.A
*Contact email: mavr@altec.gr, akou@altec.gr

Abstract

Over the past years it has become evident that an evaluation system was necessary for the European Research and Competitive funded projects which are large and complex structures needing constant monitoring. This is especially so for e-Health projects. The race to complete assignments means that this area is usually neglected. A proposed framework for the evaluation of R & D project systems using ATAM, ISO 14598 and ISO 9126 standards is presented. The evaluation framework covers a series of steps which ensures that the offered system satisfies quality, attributes such as operability, usability and maintainability imposed by the end users. The main advantage of this step by step procedure is that faults in the architecture, software or prototype can be recognised early in the development phase and corrected more rapidly. The system has a common set of attributes against which the various project’s deliverables are assessed.