
Research Article
A Systematic Comparison of Muscle Deformation Sensor Placement for Subject-Independent Cognitive State Classification
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.1007/978-3-032-38657-1_14, author={Tomo Akamine and Tamon Miyake and Satoshi Shimabukuro and Ryota Nishiguchi and Chihiro Okubo and Shinya Nakamura and Emi Tamaki}, title={A Systematic Comparison of Muscle Deformation Sensor Placement for Subject-Independent Cognitive State Classification}, proceedings={Body Area Networks. 20th EAI International Conference, BodyNets 2025, Okayama, Japan, December 2--4, 2025, Proceedings}, proceedings_a={BODYNETS}, year={2026}, month={10}, keywords={Wearable Sensors Physiological Computing Cognitive State Estimation Muscle Deformation Human-Computer Interaction Remote Collaboration}, doi={10.1007/978-3-032-38657-1_14} }- Tomo Akamine
Tamon Miyake
Satoshi Shimabukuro
Ryota Nishiguchi
Chihiro Okubo
Shinya Nakamura
Emi Tamaki
Year: 2026
A Systematic Comparison of Muscle Deformation Sensor Placement for Subject-Independent Cognitive State Classification
BODYNETS
Springer
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-38657-1_14
Abstract
The proliferation of remote work has highlighted a critical gap in digital communication: the absence of non-verbal and embodied cues, which can impede mutual understanding and productivity. This work addresses this challenge by systematically investigating an optimal anatomical site for cognitive-state estimation using non-invasive optical muscle-deformation sensors to classify states such as concentration and relaxation. To model and distinguish these muscle-deformation patterns, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was employed under a subject-independent evaluation protocol. A controlled four-site comparison across calf (gastrocnemius), trapezius, upper arm (biceps brachii), and neck (sternocleidomastoid; SCM) revealed that rather than a single best site, a trade-off was observed: calf yielded higher accuracy (), but trapezius demonstrated greater stability across participants (lower variance, standard deviation (SD) = 0.17), suggesting that optimal site selection depends on deployment context. Fine-grained confusion analysis further revealed complementary error tendencies between the two sites. For real-world deployments where robustness is paramount, trapezius is recommended; for controlled settings prioritizing peak accuracy, calf is preferable. These findings provide actionable guidance for sensor placement and motivate sensor-fusion designs that leverage complementary strengths.

