About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Body Area Networks. Smart IoT and Big Data for Intelligent Health Management. 16th EAI International Conference, BODYNETS 2021, Virtual Event, October 25-26, 2021, Proceedings

Research Article

Comparing the Performance of Different Classifiers for Posture Detection

Download(Requires a free EAI acccount)
2 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1007/978-3-030-95593-9_17,
        author={Sagar Suresh Kumar and Kia Dashtipour and Mandar Gogate and Jawad Ahmad and Khaled Assaleh and Kamran Arshad and Muhammad Ali Imran and Qammer Abbasi and Wasim Ahmad},
        title={Comparing the Performance of Different Classifiers for Posture Detection},
        proceedings={Body Area Networks. Smart IoT and Big Data for Intelligent Health Management. 16th EAI International Conference, BODYNETS 2021, Virtual Event, October 25-26, 2021, Proceedings},
        proceedings_a={BODYNETS},
        year={2022},
        month={2},
        keywords={Machine learning Deep learning Detecting Alzheimer},
        doi={10.1007/978-3-030-95593-9_17}
    }
    
  • Sagar Suresh Kumar
    Kia Dashtipour
    Mandar Gogate
    Jawad Ahmad
    Khaled Assaleh
    Kamran Arshad
    Muhammad Ali Imran
    Qammer Abbasi
    Wasim Ahmad
    Year: 2022
    Comparing the Performance of Different Classifiers for Posture Detection
    BODYNETS
    Springer
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95593-9_17
Sagar Suresh Kumar1, Kia Dashtipour1,*, Mandar Gogate2, Jawad Ahmad2, Khaled Assaleh3, Kamran Arshad3, Muhammad Ali Imran1, Qammer Abbasi1, Wasim Ahmad1
  • 1: James Watt School of Engineering
  • 2: School of Computing
  • 3: Faculty of Engineering and IT, Ajman University
*Contact email: k.dashtipour@napier.ac.uk

Abstract

Human Posture Classification (HPC) is used in many fields such as human computer interfacing, security surveillance, rehabilitation, remote monitoring, and so on. This paper compares the performance of different classifiers in the detection of 3 postures, sitting, standing, and lying down, which was recorded using Microsoft Kinect cameras. The Machine Learning classifiers used included the Support Vector Classifier, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbours, and Random Forests. The Deep Learning ones included the standard Multi-Layer Perceptron, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Long Short Term Memory Networks (LSTM). It was observed that Deep Learning methods outperformed the former and that the one-dimensional CNN performed the best with an accuracy of 93.45%.

Keywords
Machine learning Deep learning Detecting Alzheimer
Published
2022-02-11
Appears in
SpringerLink
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95593-9_17
Copyright © 2021–2025 ICST
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL