About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. 16th EAI International Conference, SecureComm 2020, Washington, DC, USA, October 21-23, 2020, Proceedings, Part II

Research Article

Share Withholding in Blockchain Mining

Download(Requires a free EAI acccount)
4 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1007/978-3-030-63095-9_9,
        author={Sang-Yoon Chang},
        title={Share Withholding in Blockchain Mining},
        proceedings={Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. 16th EAI International Conference, SecureComm 2020, Washington, DC, USA, October 21-23, 2020, Proceedings, Part II},
        proceedings_a={SECURECOMM PART 2},
        year={2020},
        month={12},
        keywords={Cryptocurrency Blockchain Rational mining Block withholding},
        doi={10.1007/978-3-030-63095-9_9}
    }
    
  • Sang-Yoon Chang
    Year: 2020
    Share Withholding in Blockchain Mining
    SECURECOMM PART 2
    Springer
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63095-9_9
Sang-Yoon Chang1,*
  • 1: University of Colorado Colorado Springs
*Contact email: schang2@uccs.edu

Abstract

Cryptocurrency achieves distributed consensus using proof of work or PoW. Prior research in blockchain security identified financially incentivized attacks based on withholding blocks which have the attacker compromise a victim pool and pose as a PoW contributor by submitting the shares (earning credit for mining) but withholding the blocks (no actual contributions to the pool). We advance such threats to generate greater reward advantage to the attackers while undermining the other miners and introduce the share withholding attack (SWH). SWH withholds shares to increase the attacker’s reward payout within the pool, in contrast to the prior threats withholding blocks focusing on the inter-pool dynamics. SWH rather builds on the block-withholding threats in order to exploit the information about the impending block submission timing, challenging the popularly established assumption that the block submission time is completely random and unknown to miners. We analyze SWH’s incentive compatibility and the vulnerability scope by identifying the critical systems and environmental parameters which determine the attack’s impact. Our results show that SWH yields unfair reward advantage at the expense of the protocol-complying victim miners and that a rational miner will selfishly launch SWH to maximize its reward profit. We inform the blockchain and cryptocurrency research of the SWH threat to facilitate further research and development to secure the blockchain consensus protocol.

Keywords
Cryptocurrency Blockchain Rational mining Block withholding
Published
2020-12-12
Appears in
SpringerLink
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63095-9_9
Copyright © 2020–2025 ICST
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL