About | Contact Us | Register | Login
ProceedingsSeriesJournalsSearchEAI
Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing. 13th International Conference, CollaborateCom 2017, Edinburgh, UK, December 11–13, 2017, Proceedings

Research Article

A Comparative Analysis of Content Delivery Capability for Collaborative Dual-Architecture Network

Download(Requires a free EAI acccount)
175 downloads
Cite
BibTeX Plain Text
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1007/978-3-030-00916-8_7,
        author={Xuan Liu and Peng Yang and Yongqiang Dong and Syed Ahmed},
        title={A Comparative Analysis of Content Delivery Capability for Collaborative Dual-Architecture Network},
        proceedings={Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing. 13th International Conference, CollaborateCom 2017, Edinburgh, UK, December 11--13, 2017, Proceedings},
        proceedings_a={COLLABORATECOM},
        year={2018},
        month={10},
        keywords={Dual-architecture Content delivery Comparative analysis Network performance User utility},
        doi={10.1007/978-3-030-00916-8_7}
    }
    
  • Xuan Liu
    Peng Yang
    Yongqiang Dong
    Syed Ahmed
    Year: 2018
    A Comparative Analysis of Content Delivery Capability for Collaborative Dual-Architecture Network
    COLLABORATECOM
    Springer
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00916-8_7
Xuan Liu,*, Peng Yang,*, Yongqiang Dong,*, Syed Ahmed1,*
  • 1: Georgia Southern University
*Contact email: yusuf@seu.edu.cn, pengyang@seu.edu.cn, dongyq@seu.edu.cn, sh.ahmed@ieee.org

Abstract

In order to deliver Internet content to people of the world for achieving the vision of “The Internet is for everyone”, our group pioneered a collaborative dual-architecture network (DAN). For quantitative analysis of DAN’s content delivery capability, in this paper we firstly propose a unified comparative model, in which network performance and user utility are taken into account. Then, by applying the model we conduct direct and indirect comparative analysis in detail. Numerical results shed light on that DAN outperforms TCP/IP, NDN (named data networking) and BSN (broadcast-storage network) in terms of delivery capability. Given this, we argue that DAN is favourable for content delivery.

Keywords
Dual-architecture Content delivery Comparative analysis Network performance User utility
Published
2018-10-17
Appears in
SpringerLink
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00916-8_7
Copyright © 2017–2025 EAI
EBSCOProQuestDBLPDOAJPortico
EAI Logo

About EAI

  • Who We Are
  • Leadership
  • Research Areas
  • Partners
  • Media Center

Community

  • Membership
  • Conference
  • Recognition
  • Sponsor Us

Publish with EAI

  • Publishing
  • Journals
  • Proceedings
  • Books
  • EUDL