Research Article
QoT-Guaranteed Protection: Survivability Under Physical Layer Impairments
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.1109/BROADNETS.2008.4769152, author={Sun-il Kim and Nnamdi Nwanze and Xiaolan J. Zhang and Steven Lumetta}, title={QoT-Guaranteed Protection: Survivability Under Physical Layer Impairments}, proceedings={5th International ICST Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks, and Systems}, publisher={IEEE}, proceedings_a={BROADNETS}, year={2010}, month={5}, keywords={WDM Network Protection Recovery Quality of Transmission Physical Layer Impairments Crosstalk}, doi={10.1109/BROADNETS.2008.4769152} }
- Sun-il Kim
Nnamdi Nwanze
Xiaolan J. Zhang
Steven Lumetta
Year: 2010
QoT-Guaranteed Protection: Survivability Under Physical Layer Impairments
BROADNETS
IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/BROADNETS.2008.4769152
Abstract
As physical layer impairments play a large role in determining the ultimate performance of all-optical networks, it has attracted much attention. However, traditional survivability schemes have been designed and utilized without considering the quality of transmission at the physical layer. Recently, a few studies on QoT-aware (quality of transmission) protection were initiated to meet the reliability needs of future communications infrastructures. In this paper, we present a study of how transmission impairments caused by non-ideal characteristics of network components (such as amplifier spontaneous emission noise and crosstalk) affect the survivability under various QoTaware protection schemes. We present heuristic QoT-guaranteed protection RWA for dynamic provisioning that forgoes multiple bit-error-rate calculations, and quantify the performance of various QoT-aware schemes. We also evaluate the tradeoff between using crosstalkfree Banyan switches and utilizing switch plane selection with non-crosstalk-free designs. It is expensive to provide QoTguaranteed protection, but the usefulness of QoT-aware (nonguaranteed) schemes, while cost-effective, depends on the topology. Our results also show that QoT-unaware algorithms, while performing significantly worse in terms of blocking, can have slightly better post-failure performance.