5th International ICST Workshop on Optical Burst/Packet Switching

Research Article

Composite Burst Assembly with High-Priority Packets in the Middle of Burst

  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1109/BROADNETS.2008.4769058,
        author={Shahzad Sarwar and Lukas Wallentin and Gerald Franzl and Harmen R. van As},
        title={Composite Burst Assembly with High-Priority Packets in the Middle of Burst},
        proceedings={5th International ICST Workshop on Optical Burst/Packet Switching},
        publisher={IEEE},
        proceedings_a={WOBS},
        year={2010},
        month={5},
        keywords={composite burst assembly  contention resolution  optical burst switching  segmentation-based partial burst dropping},
        doi={10.1109/BROADNETS.2008.4769058}
    }
    
  • Shahzad Sarwar
    Lukas Wallentin
    Gerald Franzl
    Harmen R. van As
    Year: 2010
    Composite Burst Assembly with High-Priority Packets in the Middle of Burst
    WOBS
    IEEE
    DOI: 10.1109/BROADNETS.2008.4769058
Shahzad Sarwar1,*, Lukas Wallentin1, Gerald Franzl1, Harmen R. van As1
  • 1: Vienna University of Technology Institute of Broadband Communications Favoritenstrasse 9/388, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
*Contact email: shahzad.sarwar@tuwien.ac.at

Abstract

In optical burst-switched (OBS) networks, packets are aggregated into bursts that are sent an offset time after the corresponding control packet. The process of aggregating high and low-priority traffic in the same burst is known as composite burst assembly, where high-priority and low-priority packets are placed at the head and the tail end of the burst, respectively. Such composite bursts are beneficial in order to resolve the contention by dropping low-priority packets when preemptive minimum overlap channel (P-MOC) scheduling algorithms are used. For non-preemptive minimum overlap channel with void-filling (NP-MOC-VF) scheduling algorithm, we propose that highpriority packets should be placed in the middle of a burst and low-priority packets at the head and tail ends of a burst. That allows dropping of low-priority packets from the head and the tail of a burst when it contends with two other bursts where the head of the burst contends with one burst and the tail contends with another. The simulation results show that high-priority traffic faces reduced loss at the cost of increased loss of lowpriority traffic. In this paper, the effect of varying the proportion of high-priority packets in the middle of the burst has been studied.