Research Article
Comparison of Single and Dual Frequency GNSS Receivers in the Presence of Ionospheric and Multipath Errors
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.1007/978-3-642-23825-3_35, author={Danai Skournetou and Elena-Simona Lohan}, title={Comparison of Single and Dual Frequency GNSS Receivers in the Presence of Ionospheric and Multipath Errors}, proceedings={Personal Satellite Services. Third International ICST Conference, PSATS 2011, Malaga, Spain, February 17-18, 2011, Revised Selected Papers}, proceedings_a={PSATS}, year={2012}, month={5}, keywords={Global Navigation Satellite System ionosphere multipath dual-frequency receivers}, doi={10.1007/978-3-642-23825-3_35} }- Danai Skournetou
Elena-Simona Lohan
Year: 2012
Comparison of Single and Dual Frequency GNSS Receivers in the Presence of Ionospheric and Multipath Errors
PSATS
Springer
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23825-3_35
Abstract
In this paper, we test the performance of single and dual frequency GPS and Galileo GNSS receivers in terms of satellite-receiver range estimation. In particular, we focus on the effects caused by ionosphere and multipath propagation. Therefore, the available pseudoranges are assumed to be contaminated with first-order ionospheric delay and measurement errors produced in the code tracking stage. We used three dual-frequency methods, two ionospheric models (Klobuchar and NeQuick for GPS and Galileo receivers, respectively) and compared their ionosphere-corrected ranges on a Root Mean Square Error basis. The simulation results showed that a dual-frequency receiver is superior to a single-frequency one, only when the standard deviation of the measurement error is small and when the correlation factor between the two available pseudoranges is higher than − 0.4.
