11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

Research Article

Is Fitbit Fit for Sleep-Tracking? Sources of Measurement Errors and Proposed Countermeasures

  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1145/3154862.3154897,
        author={Zilu Liang and Bernd Ploderer and Mario Chapa-Martell},
        title={Is Fitbit Fit for Sleep-Tracking? Sources of Measurement Errors and Proposed Countermeasures},
        proceedings={11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare},
        publisher={ACM},
        proceedings_a={PERVASIVEHEALTH},
        year={2018},
        month={1},
        keywords={sleep health personal informatics wearable fitbit data quality hci},
        doi={10.1145/3154862.3154897}
    }
    
  • Zilu Liang
    Bernd Ploderer
    Mario Chapa-Martell
    Year: 2018
    Is Fitbit Fit for Sleep-Tracking? Sources of Measurement Errors and Proposed Countermeasures
    PERVASIVEHEALTH
    ACM
    DOI: 10.1145/3154862.3154897
Zilu Liang,*, Bernd Ploderer1, Mario Chapa-Martell2
  • 1: Queensland University of Technology
  • 2: CAC Corporation
*Contact email: panda198893@hotmail.com

Abstract

It is now easy to track one’s sleep through consumer wearable devices like Fitbit from the comfort of one’s home. However, compared to clinical measures, the data generated by such consumer devices is limited in its accuracy. The aim of this paper is to explore how users perceive accuracy issues, possible measurement errors and what can be done to address these issues. Through an interview study with 14 Fitbit users we identified three main sources of errors: (1) lack of definition of sleep metrics, (2) limitations in underlying data collection and processing mechanisms, and (3) lack of rigor in tracking approach. This paper proposes countermeasures to address these issues, both from the aspect of technological advancement and through engaging end-users more closely with their data.