1st International ICST Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks

Research Article

Undesirable service differentiation in future WLANs

  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.1109/QSHINE.2004.52,
        author={S.  Kuppa and  S.R.  Gandham and R.  Prakash},
        title={Undesirable service differentiation in future WLANs},
        proceedings={1st International ICST Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks},
        publisher={IEEE},
        proceedings_a={QSHINE},
        year={2004},
        month={12},
        keywords={},
        doi={10.1109/QSHINE.2004.52}
    }
    
  • S. Kuppa
    S.R. Gandham
    R. Prakash
    Year: 2004
    Undesirable service differentiation in future WLANs
    QSHINE
    IEEE
    DOI: 10.1109/QSHINE.2004.52
S. Kuppa1, S.R. Gandham1, R. Prakash1
  • 1: Dept. of Comput. Sci., Texas Univ., Richardson, TX, USA

Abstract

The IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function (DCF) offers only best-effort service. The enhanced DCF (EDCF) scheme supports quality of service by establishing a probabilistic priority mechanism to access the shared wireless medium. EDCF defines four access categories, namely, AC.VO, AC-VI, AC-BE and AC-BK to support voice, video, best-effort and background traffic, respectively. Since DCF and AC_BE of EDCF offer best-effort service, it is desirable that applications demanding such a service, experience comparable delay and, throughput whether they are run on a DCF-compliant or an EDCF-compliant wireless station. In this paper, we show through simulation experiments that DCF-and EDCF-compliant stations do not provide comparable support to best-effort applications while operating together. This is due to different parameter settings in DCF and EDCF which leads to an undesirable service differentiation.